Spec Studio

A unique near miss earns a did-you-mean suggestion

spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-meanExample / Scenario · storyready floor ready

Packs: pack:self-hosting-v1

Design: no design entries · no pinned declarations · no decisions

Findings: no errors, no warnings

specs/validation/referential-integrity.did-you-mean.sdp.md

No open questions and no blocking questions; implementation binding none, verifier binding present, and expected-outcome oracle none.

Intent
outcome
Execute the unresolved-reference law where exactly one known id is a near miss.
Behavior

Examples

Given the graph holds one spec {presentId: "spec:probe.create-order"}
Given the spec declares a dependsOn relation to {targetId: "spec:probe.create-ordr"}
When the graph is validated
Then the report names {findingId: "conformance/referential-integrity"} at severity {severity: "error"}
Then the finding offers the nearest-id suggestion: {suggested: true}
Verification

Verifier bindings

Design view

Requirement drawing

  • Satisfying or referencing units: no recorded binding.
Requirement drawing for spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean
The diagram as text
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean: A unique near miss earns a did-you-mean suggestion · declared Spec
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity: Every graph reference resolves · declared Spec
  • test:protocol.referential-integrity.did-you-mean: the near-miss point verifies the unique did-you-mean suggestion · anchored test binding · binding present · test/self-hosting-validators.test.ts:764
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean refines spec:validation.referential-integrity · declared
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean verifies spec:validation.referential-integrity · declared
  • test:protocol.referential-integrity.did-you-mean verifies spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean · anchored
Mermaid source

Copyable source; the Studio draws static SVG.

Preferred and chosen syntax: requirementDiagram; exact refines, satisfies and verifies, with claim words in nodes and per-edge comments.

Decisions

No decision record named.

Runtime

No implementation neighborhood recorded.

Runtime observation: not tracked.

Evidence

Runtime observation: not tracked.

Build attestations: not tracked.

Deployments: not tracked.

Bills of materials: not tracked.

Impact
Relations of spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean
  • E2: verifies · declared
The diagram as text
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity: Every graph reference resolves
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean: A unique near miss earns a did-you-mean suggestion
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean refines spec:validation.referential-integrity · declared
  • spec:validation.referential-integrity.did-you-mean verifies spec:validation.referential-integrity · declared
Mermaid source

Copyable source; the Studio draws static SVG.

Preferred syntax: flowchart. Chosen syntax: labelled flowchart, preserving exact relations, claims and folds.

Rests on

Rested on by

No Spec rests on this Spec.

Relations

Relation and directionOther endClaimReasonExercised keys
refines · outgoingEvery graph reference resolves
spec:validation.referential-integrity · resolves
declaredNoneNone
verifies · outgoingEvery graph reference resolves
spec:validation.referential-integrity · resolves
declaredNoneNone

Bindings

Implementation binding: none

Design reference: none

Verifier binding: present

  • test:protocol.referential-integrity.did-you-mean · the near-miss point verifies the unique did-you-mean suggestion · anchored · test/self-hosting-validators.test.ts:764 · test anchor

Expected-outcome oracle: none

Runtime observation: not tracked.

Run results: not recorded in the graph.

Findings

None.

Composing (0)

Composing needs the script.